DJI launched two new professional gimbals to aid in the creation of content

DJI has officially launched it’s RS 3 Pro, alongside the RS 3 (which, somewhat oddly, is not an alternative to the RS 2, but rather an upgrade for RSC 2 instead. RSC 2). The two gimbals come with design improvements that include an automatic axis-lock mechanism, bigger 1.8 inch OLED touch screens , and a separate hardware switch to select different modes of gimbals. Both gimbals use dual-mode Bluetooth technology to allow remote shutter controls wirelessly, which eliminates the requirement for a camera-specific cable. But, as previously the cameras do not have to be equipped with this feature.

DJI has also made some changes to their stabilization algorithm, boasting the improvement in stability of 20% on both gimbals compared to earlier versions. The cost of both gimbals have increased somewhat from previous versions with the lighter RS 3 starting at $549 for the base setup, and $719 for the combo pack. Its RS 3 Pro starts at $869 and goes up to $1,099 when you purchase combination packs.

Every detail is taken care of, DJI RS 3 delivers an agile and effective shooting experience for solo creators and teams that are independent. The sleek and lightweight design gives professional stability and efficient control to allow more freedom of expression and unlimited possibilities. DJI RS 3 is ready to go when you are.

The RS 3, with its smaller footprint and 3kg maximum capacity, is better for mirrorless cameras such as Canon EOS R5, the Sony A7S III or FX3, Panasonic GH6 or Canon EOS R5. Its RS 3 Pro, meanwhile has a larger 4.5kg maximum payload and is targeted at photographers who shoot on smaller cinema cameras, such as those of the RED Komodo Sony FX3 or Canon C70.

The payload remains the same as in the RS 2. The arms, however, are now longer so that you’ll be able to carry more hefty camera + lens setups without having to pay to balance the counterweight. This is an extremely positive improvement from the earlier RS 2, my experience was that the camera could effortlessly strike the motor of the roll axis when loaded with front weights like the manual lens that is heavier and with a focus motors mounted. This can make balancing difficult in the sets. The carbon-fibre structure of the arms is also improved on top of that of RS 2, to decrease the weight and to improve durability.

The good news is that DJI has now included an extra sliding baseplate inside the case in the RS 3 Pro. In the past you had to purchase an extra one from a manufacturer third party to have enough stability to support larger payloads. The included motor for focusing is also more powerful than the previous model, is 50% quieter and comes with a more efficient quick-release mechanism.

In terms of the ecosystem including accessories and ecosystem, DJI have made major advancements and has now introduced technologies first used within the Ronin 4D cinema camera, which can be used in conjunction in conjunction with the RS 3 Pro on set. They have also introduced a brand-new, superior video transmission system, as well as an upgraded LiDAR camera module. Both are available as separate items.

It replaces Ronin Transmitter. Ronin Transmitter (previously named Raveneye) to deliver an ongoing stream to the Gimbal display. This LiDAR module also comes with an ActiveTrack Pro technology from the Ronin 4D, which provides much more precise and powerful tracking than previous. It is interesting to note that the LiDAR can be utilized with the camera and the focus motor detached by the gimbal’s head providing autofocus capabilities to manual and cinema lenses even in hand-held applications.

What is it that makes the DJI RS3 Pro different?

The feature/accessory that is most intriguing to me, however, is the brand new DJI Transmission technology. It can support an impressive distance of 6km (ideal conditions) and an ultra-low 1080p/60fps low latency stream. The transmitter can be positioned just below the camera which is powered directly by the Gimbal. The signal is transferred to DJI’s 7-inch wireless remote monitor that can be used in conjunction with four Ronin handles that manage gimbal movement and focus. Remote monitors also support motion control, which means that you can utilize gestures to control your head of the gimbal. You can also control camera’s settings right on the touchscreen screen, with Sony mirrorless cameras with what DJI refers to as “Mirror controls”.

This is a versatile and flexible integrated solution for professional sets of film in the event that the transmission system performs exactly as it claims to. You’ll be able to connect this RS 3 Pro to a crane, jib, or car rig, and then easily and easily get full gimbal and camera control via the remote display. While maintaining a top-quality performance and signal range. In addition, since the system can support multiple receivers, both the director and 1st AC will be equipped with their individual monitor(s) on the set. This DJI transmission system can be utilized with the larger Ronin 2.

What is compare to DJI RS3 compare?

Do you need to buy DJI RS 3? DJI RS 3?

DJI has made some very welcomed improvements to the key or problematic areas of their Gimbals with RS. If I were buying my first gimbal I’d definitely buy these at a discount to models from the last generation.

But , do existing gimbal owners switch to the RS 3 Pro or RS 3? Based on your camera’s setup, and setup, the longer arms on the Pro model could be worth the cost of admission by itself. Particularly since the price and weight of Ronin 2 or Movi Pro aren’t a viable choice for many creators who are solo.

For certain crews, having the option to use for the DJI Transmission system on set is a major benefit, but it’s not supported by RS 2. A majority of the existing accessories of the ecosystem from DJI and Tilta including the various controls and solutions for power are still compatible in conjunction with an RS 3 Pro however.

If you’re comfortable getting your camera to balance on the RS 2 / RSC 2 and you don’t think of buying the new Transmission System or LiDAR module (both rather expensive) I’d recommend not to bother.